<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Javascript performance on current browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nuit.dk/2009/05/06/javascript-performance-on-current-browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nuit.dk/2009/05/06/javascript-performance-on-current-browsers/</link>
	<description>Web technology, blogging, programming, Linux and IT project management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jens Ulrik</title>
		<link>http://blog.nuit.dk/2009/05/06/javascript-performance-on-current-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Ulrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 11:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nuit.dk/2009/05/06/javascript-performance-on-current-browsers/#comment-464</guid>
		<description>Just installed Safari 4 public beta on the same T60p laptop. Same test gave an average of 312,10. Never thought much of Safari on Windows - wonder if a plug-in-community similar to Firefox&#039;es could emerge under Safari..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just installed Safari 4 public beta on the same T60p laptop. Same test gave an average of 312,10. Never thought much of Safari on Windows &#8211; wonder if a plug-in-community similar to Firefox&#8217;es could emerge under Safari..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
